GraphQL and REST are both popular API design approaches. Here’s when to use each.
REST API Overview
REST (Representational State Transfer) uses HTTP methods to interact with resources.
Characteristics
- Resource-based: URLs represent resources
- HTTP methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE
- Stateless: Each request is independent
- Multiple endpoints: Different URLs for different resources
Example
GET /api/users
GET /api/users/123
POST /api/users
PUT /api/users/123
DELETE /api/users/123
GraphQL Overview
GraphQL is a query language and runtime for APIs.
Characteristics
- Single endpoint: One endpoint for all operations
- Client-driven: Clients specify what data they need
- Strongly typed: Schema defines all types
- Flexible queries: Get exactly what you need
Example
# Query
query {
user(id: "123") {
name
email
posts {
title
content
}
}
}
# Mutation
mutation {
createUser(name: "John", email: "[email protected]") {
id
name
}
}
Key Differences
1. Data Fetching
REST:
# Multiple requests
GET /api/users/123
GET /api/users/123/posts
GET /api/users/123/followers
GraphQL:
# Single request
query {
user(id: "123") {
name
posts { title }
followers { name }
}
}
2. Over-fetching and Under-fetching
REST:
- Over-fetching: Get more data than needed
- Under-fetching: Need multiple requests
GraphQL:
- No over-fetching: Get exactly what you need
- No under-fetching: Get all data in one request
3. Versioning
REST:
GET /api/v1/users
GET /api/v2/users
GraphQL:
# Add new fields without breaking
type User {
id: ID!
name: String!
email: String!
phone: String # New field, optional
}
When to Use REST
Use REST When:
Simple CRUD operations
- Standard create, read, update, delete
- No complex relationships
Caching is important
- HTTP caching works well
- CDN integration
File uploads
- REST handles file uploads easily
- GraphQL is more complex
Simple data requirements
- Fixed data structure
- No need for flexible queries
Team familiarity
- Team knows REST well
- Existing REST infrastructure
REST Example
// Express.js REST API
app.get('/api/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
const user = await db.getUser(req.params.id);
res.json(user);
});
app.post('/api/users', async (req, res) => {
const user = await db.createUser(req.body);
res.status(201).json(user);
});
When to Use GraphQL
Use GraphQL When:
Complex data relationships
- Multiple related resources
- Nested data structures
Mobile applications
- Reduce over-fetching
- Save bandwidth
Rapid frontend development
- Frontend changes don’t require backend changes
- Flexible queries
Multiple clients
- Web, mobile, desktop apps
- Different data requirements
Real-time updates
- Subscriptions for live data
- WebSocket support
GraphQL Example
// Apollo Server
const typeDefs = gql`
type User {
id: ID!
name: String!
email: String!
posts: [Post!]!
}
type Query {
user(id: ID!): User
users: [User!]!
}
type Mutation {
createUser(name: String!, email: String!): User!
}
`;
const resolvers = {
Query: {
user: (_, { id }) => db.getUser(id),
users: () => db.getUsers(),
},
Mutation: {
createUser: (_, { name, email }) => db.createUser({ name, email }),
},
};
Hybrid Approach
You can use both:
// REST for simple operations
GET /api/users
POST /api/users
// GraphQL for complex queries
POST /graphql
{
query: {
user(id: "123") {
name
posts { title }
}
}
}
Performance Considerations
REST
- Caching: HTTP caching works well
- CDN: Easy to cache at edge
- Simple: Less overhead
GraphQL
- Query complexity: Can be expensive
- N+1 problem: Need data loaders
- Caching: More complex to implement
Tools and Libraries
REST
- Express.js: Node.js framework
- Django REST: Python framework
- Spring Boot: Java framework
- FastAPI: Python framework
GraphQL
- Apollo Server: Node.js GraphQL server
- GraphQL.js: Reference implementation
- Graphene: Python GraphQL library
- Sangria: Scala GraphQL library
Migration Strategy
From REST to GraphQL
- Start with queries: Add GraphQL for read operations
- Keep REST for writes: Gradually migrate mutations
- Coexist: Run both in parallel
- Deprecate REST: Once GraphQL is stable
Conclusion
Choose REST if:
- Simple CRUD operations
- Caching is critical
- Team is familiar with REST
- Standard HTTP patterns work
Choose GraphQL if:
- Complex data relationships
- Multiple clients with different needs
- Mobile-first approach
- Rapid frontend iteration
You can also use both:
- REST for simple operations
- GraphQL for complex queries
- Best of both worlds
Remember: The best API is the one that:
- Serves your use case
- Your team can maintain
- Performs well
- Scales with your needs
Don’t choose based on trends—choose based on requirements! 🎯