Performance

This write-up condenses the published DEV tutorial “Browser-based performance testing with K6” into an actionable walkthrough for frontend teams. Why k6 browser Simulates real browser interactions (Chromium) vs. protocol-only tests. Captures Web Vitals (LCP/INP/CLS) and UX signals (spinners, interactivity). Reuses familiar k6 scripting with async/await + locators. Setup Install k6 (latest) and ensure Node/npm are available. Project skeleton: k6-tests/ libs/ # flows (login, add to cart, checkout) pages/ # Page Object Model classes tests/ # test entry scripts utils/ # shared options (browser config, VUs, iterations) Configure browser scenario (utils/k6-options.js): export const browserOptions = { scenarios: { ui: { executor: "shared-iterations", vus: 1, iterations: 15, options: { browser: { type: "chromium" } }, }, }, }; Example flow (simplified) import { browser } from "k6/browser"; import { check } from "k6"; export const options = browserOptions; export default async function () { const page = await browser.newPage(); await page.goto("https://www.saucedemo.com/"); await page.locator("#user-name").type("standard_user"); await page.locator("#password").type("secret_sauce"); await page.locator("#login-button").click(); check(page, { "login ok": () => page.locator(".title").textContent() === "Products" }); await page.close(); } Running & reporting CLI run: k6 run ./tests/buyItemsUserA.js Live dashboard: K6_WEB_DASHBOARD=true K6_WEB_DASHBOARD_OPEN=true k6 run ... Export HTML report: K6_WEB_DASHBOARD=true K6_WEB_DASHBOARD_EXPORT=results/report.html Metrics to watch (aligns to Core Web Vitals) browser_web_vital_lcp — largest content paint; target < 2.5s p75. browser_web_vital_inp — interaction to next paint; target < 200ms p75. browser_web_vital_cls — layout shift; target < 0.1. Add custom checks for “spinner disappears”, “cart count”, “success message”. Tips Keep tests short and focused; one scenario per file. Reuse Page Objects for maintainability. Run with realistic VUs/iterations that mirror expected traffic. Use screenshots on failure for debuggability (page.screenshot()). Takeaway: k6 browser mode gives frontend teams reproducible, scriptable UX performance checks—ideal for catching regressions before they reach real users.

This post distills the key ideas from the published DEV article “Frontend Performance Optimization: A Comprehensive Guide 🚀” into a concise, production-focused playbook. What matters Fast first paint and interaction: prioritize above-the-fold content, cut JS weight, avoid layout shifts. Ship less: smaller bundles, fewer blocking requests, cache aggressively. Ship smarter: load what’s needed when it’s needed (on demand and in priority order). Core techniques 1) Selective rendering Render only what is visible (e.g., IntersectionObserver + skeletons). Defer heavy components until scrolled into view. 2) Code splitting & dynamic imports Split by route/feature; lazy-load non-critical views. Example (React): const Page = lazy(() => import("./Page")); <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading…</div>}> <Page /> </Suspense>; 3) Prefetching & caching Prefetch likely-next routes/assets (<link rel="prefetch"> or router prefetch). Pre-warm API data with React Query/Next.js loader functions. 4) Priority-based loading Preload critical CSS/hero imagery: <link rel="preload" as="style" href="styles.css">. Use defer/async for non-critical scripts. 5) Compression & transfer Enable Brotli/Gzip at the edge; pre-compress static assets in CI/CD. Serve modern formats (AVIF/WebP) and keep caching headers long-lived. 6) Loading sequence hygiene Order: HTML → critical CSS → critical JS → images/fonts → analytics. Avoid long main-thread tasks; prefer requestIdleCallback for non-urgent work. 7) Tree shaking & dead-code elimination Use ESM named imports; avoid import *. Keep build in production mode with minification + module side-effects flags. Measurement & guardrails Track Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) plus TTFB and bundle size per release. Run Lighthouse/WebPageTest in CI; fail builds on regressions above agreed budgets. Monitor real-user metrics (RUM) to validate improvements after deploys. Quick starter checklist Lazy-load routes and heavy widgets. Preload hero font/hero image; inline critical CSS if needed. Turn on Brotli at CDN; cache static assets with versioned filenames. Set performance budgets (JS < 200KB gz, LCP < 2.5s p75, INP < 200ms). Automate audits in CI and watch RUM dashboards after each release. Bottom line: Combine “ship less” (smaller, shaken, compressed bundles) with “ship smarter” (prioritized, on-demand loading) and enforce budgets with automated checks to keep your app fast over time.

Based on the DEV article “Building Performant UI with Rust, WebAssembly, and Tailwind CSS,” this summary focuses on the architecture and steps to integrate the stack. Why Rust + WASM Offload CPU-heavy tasks (parsing, transforms, image ops) from the JS main thread. Near-native speed with memory safety. Keeps UI responsive while heavy logic runs in WASM. Why Tailwind here Utility-first styling keeps CSS minimal and predictable. Co-locate styles with components; avoid global collisions. Fast to iterate on responsive layouts for WASM-powered widgets. Integration workflow Compile Rust to WASM with wasm-pack/wasm-bindgen. Import the .wasm module via your bundler (Vite/Webpack/esbuild) and expose JS bindings. Call Rust functions from JS; render results in Tailwind-styled components. Use containers like overflow-x-auto, max-w-full, sm:rounded-lg to keep WASM widgets responsive. Example flow (pseudo) // rust-lib/src/lib.rs (simplified) #[wasm_bindgen] pub fn summarize(data: String) -> String { // heavy work here... format!("size: {}", data.len()) } // web/src/useSummarize.ts import init, { summarize } from "rust-wasm-lib"; export async function useSummarize(input: string) { await init(); return summarize(input); } Performance notes Keep WASM modules small; lazy-load them when the feature is needed. Avoid blocking the main thread—invoke WASM in response to user actions, not eagerly. Profile with browser DevTools + wasm-bindgen debug symbols when needed. Design principles Establish Tailwind design tokens/utilities for spacing/typography early. Encapsulate WASM widgets as reusable components with clear props. Reserve space to prevent layout shifts when results arrive. Good fits Data/analytics dashboards, heavy transforms, visualization prep. Fintech/scientific tools where CPU work dominates. Developer tools needing deterministic, fast processing in-browser. Takeaway: Let Rust/WASM handle the heavy lifting while Tailwind keeps the UI lean and consistent—yielding responsive, performant web experiences.

Test design Define goals: latency budgets (p95/p99), error ceilings, throughput targets. Scenarios: ramping arrival rate, soak tests, spike tests; match production payloads. Include auth headers and realistic think time. k6 script skeleton import http from "k6/http"; import { check, sleep } from "k6"; export const options = { thresholds: { http_req_duration: ["p(95)<300"] }, scenarios: { api: { executor: "ramping-arrival-rate", startRate: 10, timeUnit: "1s", preAllocatedVUs: 50, maxVUs: 200, stages: [ { target: 100, duration: "3m" }, { target: 100, duration: "10m" }, { target: 0, duration: "2m" }, ]}, }, }; export default function () { const res = http.get("https://api.example.com/resource"); check(res, { "status 200": (r) => r.status === 200 }); sleep(1); } Run & observe Capture k6 summary + JSON output; feed to Grafana for trends. Correlate with Go metrics (pprof, Prometheus) to find CPU/alloc hot paths. Record build SHA; compare runs release over release. Checklist Scenarios match prod traffic shape. Thresholds tied to SLOs; tests fail on regressions. Service metrics/pprof captured during runs.

When to use CPU-bound tasks (crypto, compression, image/video processing) that would block event loop. Avoid for short, tiny tasks—overhead may outweigh benefit. Patterns Use a pool (e.g., piscina/workerpool) with bounded size; queue tasks. Pass data via Transferable when large buffers; avoid heavy serialization. Propagate cancellation/timeouts; surface errors to main thread. Observability Track queue length, task duration, worker utilization, crashes. Monitor event loop lag to confirm offload benefits. Safety Validate inputs in main thread; avoid untrusted code in workers. Cleanly shut down pool on SIGTERM; drain and close workers. Checklist CPU tasks isolated to workers; pool sized to cores. Transferables used for big buffers; timeouts set. Metrics for queue/utilization/errors in place.

Performance notes Fastify: schema-driven, AJV validation, low-overhead routing; typically better RPS and lower p99s. Express: mature ecosystem; middleware can add overhead; great for quick prototypes. Bench considerations Compare with same validation/parsing; disable unnecessary middleware in Express. Test under keep-alive and HTTP/1.1 & HTTP/2 where applicable. Measure event loop lag and heap; not just RPS. Migration tips Start new services with Fastify; for existing Express apps, migrate edge routes first. Replace middleware with hooks/plugins; map Express middlewares to Fastify equivalents. Validate payloads with JSON schema for speed and safety. Operational tips Use pino (Fastify default) for structured logs; avoid console log overhead. Keep plugin count minimal; watch async hooks cost. Load test with realistic payload sizes; profile hotspots before/after migration. Takeaway: Fastify wins on raw throughput and structured DX; Express still fine for smaller apps, but performance-critical services benefit from Fastify’s lower overhead.

Principles Keep goroutine count bounded; size pools to CPU/core and downstream QPS. Apply backpressure: bounded channels + select with default to shed load early. Context everywhere: cancel on timeouts/parent cancellation; close resources. Prefer immutability; minimize shared state. Use channels for coordination. Patterns Worker pool with buffered jobs; fan-out/fan-in via contexts. Rate limit with time.Ticker or golang.org/x/time/rate. Semaphore via buffered channel for limited resources (DB, disk, external API). Sync cheatsheet sync.Mutex for critical sections; avoid long hold times. sync.WaitGroup for bounded concurrent tasks; errgroup for cancellation on first error. sync.Map only for high-concurrency, write-light cases; prefer map+mutex otherwise. Instrument & guard pprof: net/http/pprof + CPU/mem profiles in staging under load. Trace blocking: GODEBUG=schedtrace=1000,scavtrace=1 when diagnosing. Metrics: goroutines, GC pause, allocations, queue depth, worker utilization. Checklist Context per request; timeouts set at ingress. Bounded goroutines; pools sized and observable. Backpressure on queues; drop/timeout strategy defined. pprof/metrics enabled in non-prod and behind auth in prod. Load tests for saturation behavior and graceful degradation.

Core settings max.poll.interval.ms sized to processing time; max.poll.records to batch size. fetch.min.bytes/fetch.max.wait.ms to trade latency vs throughput. enable.auto.commit=false; commit sync/async after processing batch. Concurrency Prefer multiple consumer instances over massive max.poll.records. For CPU-bound steps, hand off to bounded executor; avoid blocking poll thread. Ordering & retries Keep partition affinity when ordering matters; use DLT for poison messages. Backoff with jitter on retries; limit attempts per message. Observability Metrics: lag per partition, commit latency, rebalances, processing time, error rates. Log offsets and partition for errors; trace batch sizes. Checklist Poll loop never blocks; work delegated to bounded pool. Commits after successful processing; DLT in place. Lag and rebalance metrics monitored.

Database performance is critical for application scalability. Here are proven optimization techniques. 1. Indexing Strategy When to Index -- Index frequently queried columns CREATE INDEX idx_user_email ON users(email); -- Index foreign keys CREATE INDEX idx_post_user_id ON posts(user_id); -- Composite indexes for multi-column queries CREATE INDEX idx_user_status_role ON users(status, role); When NOT to Index Columns with low cardinality (few unique values) Frequently updated columns Small tables (< 1000 rows) 2. Query Optimization Avoid SELECT * -- Bad SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = 123; -- Good SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = 123; Use LIMIT -- Always limit large result sets SELECT * FROM posts ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 20; Avoid N+1 Queries // Bad: N+1 queries users.forEach(user => { const posts = db.query('SELECT * FROM posts WHERE user_id = ?', [user.id]); }); // Good: Single query with JOIN const usersWithPosts = db.query(` SELECT u.*, p.* FROM users u LEFT JOIN posts p ON u.id = p.user_id `); 3. Connection Pooling // Configure connection pool const pool = mysql.createPool({ connectionLimit: 10, host: 'localhost', user: 'user', password: 'password', database: 'mydb', waitForConnections: true, queueLimit: 0 }); 4. Caching Application-Level Caching // Cache frequently accessed data const cache = new Map(); async function getUser(id) { if (cache.has(id)) { return cache.get(id); } const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?', [id]); cache.set(id, user); return user; } Query Result Caching -- Use query cache (MySQL) SET GLOBAL query_cache_size = 67108864; SET GLOBAL query_cache_type = 1; 5. Database Schema Optimization Normalize Properly -- Avoid over-normalization -- Balance between normalization and performance Use Appropriate Data Types -- Use smallest appropriate type TINYINT instead of INT for small numbers VARCHAR(255) instead of TEXT when possible DATE instead of DATETIME when time not needed 6. Partitioning -- Partition large tables by date CREATE TABLE logs ( id INT, created_at DATE, data TEXT ) PARTITION BY RANGE (YEAR(created_at)) ( PARTITION p2023 VALUES LESS THAN (2024), PARTITION p2024 VALUES LESS THAN (2025), PARTITION p2025 VALUES LESS THAN (2026) ); 7. Query Analysis EXPLAIN Plan EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '[email protected]'; Slow Query Log -- Enable slow query log SET GLOBAL slow_query_log = 'ON'; SET GLOBAL long_query_time = 1; 8. Batch Operations // Bad: Multiple individual inserts users.forEach(user => { db.query('INSERT INTO users (name, email) VALUES (?, ?)', [user.name, user.email]); }); // Good: Batch insert const values = users.map(u => [u.name, u.email]); db.query('INSERT INTO users (name, email) VALUES ?', [values]); 9. Database Maintenance Regular Vacuuming (PostgreSQL) VACUUM ANALYZE; Optimize Tables (MySQL) OPTIMIZE TABLE users; 10. Monitoring Monitor query performance Track slow queries Monitor connection pool usage Watch for table locks Monitor disk I/O Best Practices Index strategically Optimize queries Use connection pooling Implement caching Normalize appropriately Use appropriate data types Partition large tables Analyze query performance Batch operations Regular maintenance Conclusion Database optimization requires: ...